A machine has been manufactured, the EAC declaration has been registered, and the freight forwarder has been hired. It is only during the shipping inspection that it becomes apparent: the EAC mark is missing from the nameplate. Or the model designation on the packaging does not match the certificate of conformity. Such discrepancies can be avoided by conducting a marking inspection early on.
Correct EAC marking requires that the product meets the relevant requirements and that the prescribed conformity assessment procedures have been completed. The mark alone does not replace a required EAC certificate or an EAC declaration. The following checklist helps manufacturers, exporters, and importers systematically verify the marking before shipment. It combines the general requirements for the EAC mark with practical checks for product data, documentation, and scope of delivery.
As of: October 2026
What does the EAC marking mean?
EAC stands for “Eurasian Conformity.” The mark confirms that a product complies with the applicable technical regulations and has undergone the conformity assessment procedures specified therein. The design and use of the mark are governed by Resolution No. 711 of July 15, 2011.
The Eurasian Economic Union comprises five member states: Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Russia. The EAC mark is therefore not exclusively a Russian mark. Not every product requires the EAC mark. First, it must be determined whether and which technical regulations apply to the specific product. A national or voluntary certificate does not, in and of itself, confer the right to use the EAC mark.
1. Clearly identify the product and the applicable regulations
Before designing the label, the regulatory classification must be determined. A general trade name or the customs tariff number alone is often not sufficient for this purpose. Technical characteristics, function, and intended use must also be evaluated. Depending on the product, the following regulations may be relevant, for example:
Product Area | Example of a set of standards to be reviewed |
|---|---|
Machinery and Equipment | TR CU 010/2011 – Safety of Machinery and Equipment |
Low‑Voltage Equipment | TR CU 004/2011 – Safety of Low‑Voltage Equipment |
Electromagnetic Compatibility | TR CU 020/2011 – Electromagnetic Compatibility of Technical Equipment |
Explosion‑Protected Equipment | TR CU 012/2011 – Safety of Equipment for Potentially Explosive Atmospheres |
Pressure Equipment | TR CU 032/2013 – Safety of Equipment Subject to Overpressure |
Certain Electrical and Electronic Products | TR EAEU 037/2016 – Restriction of Hazardous Substances |
The table is intended as a guide, not a blanket classification. Areas of application, exceptions, and overlaps must be reviewed on a product‑by‑product basis. The Eurasian Economic Commission publishes the adopted regulations and related amendments. Checkpoints:
- Product, models, and variants clearly described
- Technical data and intended use verified
- All relevant regulations, including exceptions, have been identified
- Current versions and transitional provisions have been taken into account
- Additional national requirements in the country of destination have been reviewed
2. Compare proofs of conformity with the actual shipment
Labeling approval should be based on the final documentation. An application form, a draft, or a test report alone is not a substitute for the required proof of conformity. For internal control purposes, it is recommended to compare the purchase order, product list, and certificate or declaration. Any attachments to the documents should also be taken into account. Checkpoints:
- Required certificates have been issued or declarations have been registered
- Document status has been verified in the relevant official registry
- Manufacturer and relevant production sites have been correctly recorded
- Delivered models are covered by the documented product scope
- Correctly assigned to series production, batch, or individual delivery
- Validity of the proof regarding manufacturing and delivery verified
- Required monitoring measures taken into account
Practical tip: Save the registry status with the date in the project file. This facilitates follow‑up inquiries. However, a registry entry does not replace verification against the actual delivered version.
3. Use the EAC symbol in its official form
According to Resolution No. 711, the EAC mark must conform to the specified geometric design. The minimum dimension is 5 mm. The mark must be monochromatic, high‑contrast, and designed so that it remains clearly recognizable throughout the product’s entire service life. Checkpoints:
- Official graphic used instead of self‑designed letters
- Proportions unchanged
- Minimum size verified on the finished print
- Sufficient contrast with the background
- Contours recognizable without magnification
- Design suitable for the intended conditions of use
Check not only the graphic file but also a printed sample. When scaling a complete label, the EAC mark may become too small without being noticed. For in‑house quality control, it is also recommended to test for abrasion as well as for moisture, cleaning, or temperature exposure expected during use.
4. Check the specified installation location
Whether the EAC mark must appear on the product, the packaging, and/or the accompanying documentation is determined by the applicable technical regulations. The location where the mark is to be affixed is therefore not freely selectable. For machines subject to TR ZU 010/2011, the mark must generally be affixed directly to each machine or piece of equipment itself. Only if it is not possible to affix the mark directly to the product do the regulations permit its placement on the packaging and in the accompanying operating instructions. Checkpoints:
- Marking locations specified for each relevant set of regulations
- Every individual product subject to marking requirements is accounted for
- Any required packaging markings are present
- Prescribed markings on the accompanying documentation are implemented
- Any exception claimed is technically justified and documented
A mark on the shipping crate does not automatically apply to all products contained therein. Check each product group separately, especially for consolidated shipments.
5. Ensure that product information is complete and consistent
In practice, EAC marking involves more than just affixing a logo. Product regulations may require additional information. The specific information that must appear on the product, the packaging, or in the instructions must be determined for each individual product. The following overview can serve as a checklist for label inspection. Not every item listed is required for every product.
Information Section | Information to be clarified |
|---|---|
Product Identification | Name, Type, Model, or Part Number |
Manufacturer | Name, brand (if applicable), and address |
Traceability | Serial number, lot number, or date of manufacture |
Technical Specifications | For example, voltage, power, pressure, or load capacity |
Responsible Economic Actors | Information regarding the importer or authorized representative, to the extent required |
Safety | Warnings, Limits of Use, and Special Labeling |
Usage | Storage conditions, shelf life, or processing instructions, as applicable |
Checkpoints:
- Mandatory information and its placement locations derived from product regulations
- Model designations verified across labels, instructions, and documentation
- Manufacturer data used consistently
- Technical specifications compared with the delivered product
- Additional safety markings taken into account
Avoid using untested sample labels from other projects. A label for an electrical appliance is not a reliable template for a pressure vessel or a textile product.
6. Take languages and accompanying documentation
The EAC mark remains the same in all member states. However, different language requirements may apply to product information and instructions. TR ZU 010/2011, for example, requires an instruction manual in Russian and additionally in the respective national language, to the extent that the law of the relevant member state so provides. Safety‑related warnings must also be reviewed accordingly.
Checkpoints:
- All actual countries of sale have been identified
- Language requirements for labels, warnings, and instructions have been verified
- All required translations have been completed
- Technical terms and units have been reviewed for accuracy
- Translations have been clearly assigned to the correct models and document versions
Practical tip: Clarify the required languages before approving the print version. An English instruction manual alone should not be considered sufficient without review.
7. Plan for labeling early in the shipping process
The labeling must be in place by the prescribed date. For machinery, TR ZU 010/2011 explicitly specifies the date prior to placing the product on the market. In addition, when importing goods subject to conformity assessment, the relevant procedures must be followed; EAEU Decision No. 130 of November 12, 2021, is relevant in this regard, among other regulations.
Labeling only after arrival at the end customer should therefore not be planned as a standard solution.
Recommended operational approval points:
- Responsibility for creating and affixing labels has been assigned
- Timing of labeling has been coordinated with the importer and customs representative
- Labels checked before packaging
- Type plates and packaging markings photographed
- Accompanying documents compiled in the required format
- Shipment approval documented by a designated responsible person
These controls are recommendations for internal organization. They do not replace the product‑specific verification of the legally required labeling time.
8. Review digital labeling separately
Additional identification and traceability systems may apply to certain goods. The EAEU distinguishes this marking with identification means from the technical conformity marking.
An EAC mark therefore does not replace any individual identification codes that may be required. Conversely, such a code does not confirm EAC conformity. Checkpoints:
- Additional digital marking requirements for the product and destination country have been reviewed
- Responsibility for registration and code acquisition has been clarified
- Space requirements on the packaging or label have been taken into account
- Interaction with batch and shipping data has been coordinated
Case Study on Labeling Inspection Prior to Export
The following example is fictional and is provided for illustrative purposes.
A German manufacturer is preparing an industrial packaging machine for shipment to Kazakhstan. The required conformity assessment procedures have been completed. During the internal pre‑shipment inspection, it is discovered that the machine’s nameplate reads “VP‑400 K,” while the project documentation only lists “VP‑400.” Furthermore, the EAC mark is currently located exclusively on the shipping crate.
Before approval is granted, it is clarified whether the “VP‑400 K” variant is covered by the certification documentation. Simply renaming the nameplate would not be an appropriate solution if it were to conceal technical differences. Subsequently, the labeling is updated directly on the machine, and the documentation is reconciled with the actual design. The language versions required for the target market are also verified.
This example illustrates why the final inspection should consider the product, certification, and labeling together. The mere existence of a formal document does not prevent errors during implementation at the factory.
Prepare EAC Marking with AC Inorms GmbH
AC Inorms GmbH assists manufacturers and exporters in identifying the relevant regulations, preparing evidence of conformity, and reviewing labeling designs. For a product‑specific review, the following are particularly helpful: technical data sheets, existing certificates or declarations, a draft of the nameplate or label, and the intended countries of destination.
Plan for EAC marking as early as the order processing stage. This allows for necessary adjustments to be made before production, packaging, and shipping.
Official Sources
- Resolution No. 711 - Design and Use of the EAC Mark.
- Eurasian Economic Union - Member States.
- Eurasian Economic Commission - Adopted Technical Regulation.
- TR No. 010/2011 - Regulations and Amendments, in particular Articles 4 and 12, as well as the safety requirements in Annex 1.
- Resolution No. 130 of November 12, 2021 — Import of Goods Subject to Conformity Assessment.
- Eurasian Economic Commission - Marking with Identification Means.
No. The applicable technical regulations and the prescribed procedure are decisive. Delivery to an EAEU member state alone does not constitute a general requirement for EAC marking.
In general, a sticker may be suitable if it meets the requirements for design, application, and long‑term legibility. The specifications set forth in the relevant product regulations remain decisive. A shipping label that peels off easily is not automatically suitable for this purpose.
The general EAC marking requirements do not include a blanket requirement to place the certificate or declaration number immediately next to the mark. Additional information requirements must be verified in the relevant product regulations.
That depends on the product regulations. For machinery, labeling on the product itself is generally required; the exceptions listed apply only when labeling is affixed exclusively to the packaging and operating instructions.
No. CE and EAC are part of different conformity assessment systems. An existing CE marking does not replace the required EAC procedure or the resulting marking.
